Trail Stop 2: Becoming a Reviewer and Accepting (or Declining) the Invitation

Many scholars seek to become peer reviewers but lack guidance. This article outlines how to start, emphasizing the importance of relevant expertise and professional visibility. It advises on qualifications, making direct inquiries to editors, and responding to invitations. Effective communication and self-assessment are key to successful peer reviewing.

A Conversation about The Conversation

Karen J. Foli discusses her experience publishing with The Conversation, a nonprofit news organization that collaborates with experts to present accessible content. She highlights the advantages of this model over traditional scholarly publishing, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the broad readership and opportunities that followed her article on nurses' psychological trauma.

Commentary from Camp Leadership: Make it Look N.I.C.E.

Leslie Nicoll and Jenny Chicca emphasize the importance of presenting written work effectively in their guide to making manuscripts N.I.C.E.—Neat, Intentional, Correct, and Eye-catching. They highlight common writing pitfalls and offer strategies to enhance clarity and engagement, ultimately aiming to bolster credibility in academic publishing.