The Writer’s Camp Journal: Issues 2025
Volume 1, Number 3, Fall 2025
- Saver C. Reducing publication rejection. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(3):1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17251526
- Abstract: Cynthia Saver emphasizes that rejection is common for authors but offers strategies to minimize it. By adhering to journal guidelines, selecting suitable publications, and improving manuscript clarity, writers can enhance their chances of acceptance. When faced with rejection, it’s crucial to avoid discouragement and consider peer feedback for future submissions.
- Pickler RH. Writing effective, timely, and thought provoking editorials. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(3):2. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17290556
- Abstract: Rita H. Pickler discusses the significance of editorials in journals, emphasizing their role in communicating vital trends and issues beyond typical scientific papers. She outlines key elements for writing effective editorials, including topic selection, tone, and structure, while sharing personal experiences and the importance of remaining relevant and engaging.
- Bowers-Abbott M. Write better conclusions with this one simple trick! The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):3. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17361957
- Abstract: Miriam Bowers-Abbott critiques traditional conclusion writing, suggesting that instead of summarizing, conclusions should explore implications and pose questions. By analyzing examples, she emphasizes that a meaningful conclusion should find significance in findings, invite further research, and introduce new perspectives, enriching the reader’s understanding rather than restating points.
- Waldrop JB. Wordcraft at camp: Use vs. utilize. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):4. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17368086
- Abstract: Julee Briscoe Waldrop advises writers on the distinction between “use” and “utilize.” “Use” refers to employing something for its intended purpose, while “utilize” signifies a novel or improvised application. Writers are encouraged to prefer “use” for clarity, as “utilize” can appear overly formal and unnecessary.
- Chicca J. Writing, Caring, Nursing Publications, and You. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17391311
- Abstract: Jenny Chicca shares her personal journey with disabilities while emphasizing the importance of inclusive language in nursing writing. She discusses person-first and identity-first language and their implications for representation. The article advocates for careful communication to promote respect and understanding, ultimately aiming to enhance healthcare outcomes through thoughtful writing practices.
- Nicoll LH. Wordcraft at camp: Instrument vs. tool. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):6. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17391476
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the distinction between “instruments” and “tools” in research language. An instrument refers to structured measures for data collection, while a tool aids in analysis or organization. Clarity in terminology is crucial for effective communication in research reports to keep readers focused on content rather than terminology misuse.
- Kelly L. The Disappearing Writer: AI, Authorship, and the Fragile Future of Nursing Trust. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):7. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1739172
- Abstract: Lisa Kelly reflects on the growing issue of AI misuse in nursing education, stemming from a personal experience with faulty citations. She emphasizes that reliance on AI threatens the integrity of nursing by eroding trust and inhibiting critical thinking. The need for transparency, vulnerability, and genuine engagement in writing is paramount to rebuild this essential trust within the profession.
- Ali P. Wordcraft at Camp: When Connecting Words Get in the Way. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):8. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17391358
- Abstract: Parveen A. Ali emphasizes the importance of using connecting words judiciously in writing. While they serve to clarify relationships between ideas, overuse can render prose mechanical and stiff. Writers should avoid redundancy and formality, trusting readers to grasp logical connections without excessive transitions for clearer and more engaging communication.
- Nicoll LH. Camp Directory Commentary: Artificial intelligence and me. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17450174
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll shares her evolving perspective on artificial intelligence (AI) through her experiences with ChatGPT, referred to as Counselor Byte. Initially skeptical, she found AI invaluable in managing metadata for her Writer’s Camp. While acknowledging AI’s potential pitfalls, she embraces it as a complement to her writing process and a helpful resource.
- Owens J. Preprints Part I: An Era of Public Review. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(3):10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17476019
- Abstract: Preprints are draft manuscripts shared online before peer review, offering advantages like rapid dissemination and open access. However, concerns include potential misinformation and plagiarism risks. Public feedback is encouraged, but it may lack rigor. With growing usage post-COVID-19, understanding and guidelines are crucial for authors and editors moving forward.
- Owens, J. Preprints part 2: Considerations for authors and editors. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(3):11. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17593692
- Abstract: This article examines the preprint process, highlighting its benefits and challenges for authors and editors. Preprints allow authors to receive early feedback and control dissemination but may risk acceptance in peer-reviewed journals. Editors face new roles and guidelines as preprints increase, fostering transparent evaluation and broader academic engagement.
- Nicoll LH. Editors have memories. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17641508
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll highlights common pitfalls authors encounter when submitting to journals. Key errors include arguing with editors, withdrawing manuscripts mid-review, neglecting revisions, failing to adhere to new journal guidelines, and pestering editors for expedited processing. Authors should strive for courteous interactions, attentiveness to feedback, and professional manuscript presentation.
- Carpenter R. Anthropomorphism in academic writing. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):13. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17643497
- Abstract: Roger D. Carpenter discusses anthropomorphism in academic writing, emphasizing its risks of obscuring author agency and clarity. He advises against attributing human actions to nonhuman entities and suggests using first-person pronouns to clarify authorship. Style guides also advocate for maintaining clear communication about who is interpreting and analyzing research.
- De Gagne JC. Artificial Intelligence and Academic Writing: Innovation with Integrity. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):14. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17714284
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping academic publishing by streamlining workflows, enhancing peer review processes, and offering significant administrative relief. While AI cannot replace human judgment, it assists in tasks like plagiarism detection. Ethical challenges regarding authorship are prominent, emphasizing the need for transparency and responsibility. Embracing AI is essential for scholars’ development.
- Peterson GM, Owens J, Fowler M, Freysteinson WM, Fawcett J. Limit the limitations: Rethinking how we write about constraints in scholarly work. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(3):17. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17724399
- Abstract:
- Tissot F. The power of I (and me): A writer’s guide to first person clarity. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(3):18. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17831798
- Abstract: Faith A. Tissot explores the appropriate use of first-person pronouns “I” and “me” in scholarly writing. She emphasizes that understanding their grammatical roles enhances clarity and professional tone. Tissot also discusses how different style guides address these pronouns, advocating for attention to audience and context to improve academic writing effectiveness.
- Waldrop JB, Reynolds S. Why evidence reviews are not research studies. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):19. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17945800
- Abstract: The article by Julee Briscoe Waldrop and Staci Reynolds emphasizes the importance of clearly distinguishing between systematic search strategies and systematic reviews when conducting evidence-based practice (EBP) initiatives. Effective EBP relies on high-quality evidence for practice change recommendations. Authors often conflate these concepts, impairing clarity and hindering meaningful practice improvements.
- Chicca J. Plain language as a recipe for effective writing. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):15. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18036423
- Abstract: Jenny Chicca offers ten principles for effective writing, emphasizing clarity and accessibility. Key strategies include understanding your audience, stating main points upfront, using active voice, and employing everyday language. By organizing content and proofreading thoroughly, writers can create impactful and comprehensible materials that resonate with readers, enhancing overall communication efficacy.
- Nicoll LH. Wordcraft at Camp: Method versus methodology. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(3):16. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18091027
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll clarifies the distinction between “method” and “methodology.” Method refers to specific procedures used in research, while methodology pertains to the theoretical frameworks guiding these methods. Authors are encouraged to use “method” for clarity in most cases, reserving “methodology” for discussions on research philosophy. Precision improves understanding.
Volume 1, Number 2, Summer 2025
- Waldrop JB, Dunlap JJ. Is it 70%, 80%, or 94%? The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(2):1, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15792795
- Abstract: The article discusses overcoming perfectionism in writing, especially in nursing education manuscripts. It outlines models of perfectionism, such as Hewitt and Flett’s theory, and presents strategies like the 70/30 rule to encourage progress over perfection. Authors emphasize the importance of embracing feedback and iterating work for improvement.
- Nicoll, LH. Manuscript success: using a template article: why it works. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):2. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15792795
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of using a template article as a starting point for writing a manuscript. This framework helps alleviate the anxiety of facing a blank page by providing structure, proper formatting, and alignment with the target journal. Successful examples illustrate how template articles guide manuscript development effectively.
- Pickler RH. Why You, and They, Need an ORCiD. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):3. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15836207
- Abstract: The article emphasizes the necessity of obtaining an Open Researcher and Contributor identification number (ORCiD) for researchers and their co-authors. As publishers increasingly require ORCiDs for all authors, it highlights the importance of persistent identifiers in ensuring proper recognition and tracking of contributions, especially for community advisory board members.
- Ali P. When References Are Fabricated: A Quiet Warning from the Reference List. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):4. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15870891
- Abstract: Parveen Ali emphasizes the critical importance of accurate referencing in academic work, sharing personal experiences that highlight its role in maintaining integrity. With the rise of AI tools generating fabricated references, she urges authors, editors, and educators to prioritize citation accuracy to uphold trust in academic scholarship and to prevent compromising ethical standards.
- Bowers-Abbott M. Eight ways to measure ideas that count. Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):5. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15871095
- Abstract: Miriam Bowers-Abbott discusses various quantitative measurement methods in nursing education. She emphasizes the importance of data from student exams, course evaluations, learning management systems, and surveys, among others. By utilizing these metrics, educators can effectively assess the efficacy of teaching innovations and improve educational outcomes.
- DeCoux Hampton. M. The ABC’s of Attribution: Considerations For Why, What, and How to Cite Sources. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):6. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16370936
- Abstract: Michelle DeCoux Hampton emphasizes the importance of accurate citation in academic writing. She discusses personal experiences with citation errors and their impact on research credibility. The article outlines the reasons for citation, differentiates between primary and secondary sources, and offers tips for effective paraphrasing, reinforcing the need for academic integrity.
- Nicoll LH. Using a Template Article: How to Do It. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):7. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16507159
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll, PhD, outlines a structured approach to effectively analyze a template article as part of the Manuscript Success Process. Key steps include counting paragraphs, identifying heading levels, and adding paragraphs to sections. This method allows for a clearer understanding of the article’s structure and is crucial for organizing one’s own writing.
- Fowler MD. Wresting with the Must: The Journey of Learning Write. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025; 1(2):8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16570220
- Abstract: Marsha Fowler shares seven essential lessons from her writing journey, emphasizing the importance of writing on topics of passion and understanding personal writing rhythms. She advocates for recognizing one’s unique process, whether bolus or steady drip, and rethinking experiences often labeled as writer’s block, viewing them instead as necessary periods of mental preparation.
- Nicoll LH. The Manuscript Math Outline. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16644557
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll introduces the Manuscript Math Outline (MMO), a structured approach to writing that emphasizes single-idea paragraphs. Each paragraph serves as a building block, guiding the manuscript’s development while ensuring clarity and organization. Nicoll discusses organizing content and maintaining appropriate manuscript length for publication.
- Watson R. Past, Present, and Future: Using Verb Tenses Correctly in Scientific Research Manuscripts. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16759947
- Abstract: Roger Watson emphasizes the importance of correct verb tense usage in scientific manuscripts. Consistent application aids clarity for editors and reviewers, distinguishing known facts from research actions. Different manuscript sections require specific tenses: past for methods and results, present for current facts, and future for recommendations. Proper tense management ensures logical coherence.
- Nicoll LH. Manuscript Success: Writing the First Draft. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):11. Doi:10.5281/zenodo.16687909
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of preparation for successful manuscript writing. Key steps include selecting a journal, preparing guidelines, and creating a Manuscript Math Outline. Writers should establish their environment, select optimal writing times, and utilize short writing periods effectively. Finally, editing and feedback enhance the drafting process for successful publication.
- Oermann M, Gapp DA. Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Reformatting References in Scholarly Writing. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16813876
- Abstract: Generative AI tools like ChatGPT are impacting nursing scholarship by assisting in various tasks, but concerns about accuracy, bias, and plagiarism persist. Authors must ensure the reliability of AI-generated content and disclose its use in their work. For reference formatting, traditional management software is more reliable than AI.
- Phillips B. REFRAME Rejection: Practical Tips for Developing Rejection Resilience. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025; 1(2):13. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16912035
- Abstract: Brad Phillips discusses the inevitability of manuscript rejection and its emotional impact on early-career scholars. He outlines strategies to build rejection resilience, including realizing rejection is normal, examining feedback, and seeking clarity. By sharing experiences and engaging in peer review, authors can prepare for future challenges in the publication process.
- Rohan A, Nicoll LH. Email Hints and Caveats: Advice for Authors Some Basics: Email Address and Signature Etiquette. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):14. doi:10.5281/zenodo.16955688
- Abstract: The content discusses essential email etiquette for professionals, particularly authors and editors. Key points include the importance of using a simple, professional email address, maintaining consistency in contact details, creating a clear signature with necessary credentials, and ensuring attention to formatting. Adhering to these standards enhances communication and reflects professionalism.
- Files
- Nicoll LH. A commentary on manuscript length. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025; 1(2):15 doi:10.5281/zenodo.16952048
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the critical importance of adhering to manuscript length requirements for journal submissions. Many journals specify length, and failing to comply can lead to immediate rejection. Authors should conduct thorough research and analysis of published articles to determine appropriate word counts, ensuring their work aligns with editors’ expectations for successful publication.
- Tissot FA. Cultivating the publishable writer within. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025; 1(2):16 doi:10.5281/zenodo.17049144
- Abstract: In Cultivating the Publishable Writer Within, Faith A. Tissot guides budding scholars in transforming academic assignments into publishable manuscripts. She highlights the need for persistence, resilience, mentorship, and daily writing. Drawing on Writer’s Camp resources and personal experiences, she shows how feedback and revision build confidence and lead to publication success.
- Chicca J. Writing as storytelling: An homage to Bob Keddell. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):17. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17100666
- Abstract: Jenny Chicca honors her father, Bob Keddell, a fun-ducational expert and camp director, sharing stories from their time at ECRC summer camps. Bob’s unique approach combined learning with storytelling, emphasizing the importance of engaging narrative in writing. His legacy inspires others to tell their stories with curiosity and humor.
- Ali P. Listing of Credentials in Professional Publications. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025; 1(2):18 doi:10.5281/zenodo.17148062
- Abstract: Parveen A. Ali, a nursing scholar and Editor-in-Chief of the International Nursing Review, discusses challenges surrounding author credential visibility in academic publications. Current practices typically limit author details to names and affiliations, raising concerns about understanding author expertise. A push for uniformity and transparency in credential presentation is advocated for nursing and other disciplines.
- Shellenbarger T. Proofreading for perfection. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):19. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17186888
- Abstract: Teresa Shellenbarger emphasizes the critical role of proofreading in ensuring a polished document. Various strategies include taking breaks, changing formats, using AI tools, reading aloud, and seeking external help. Each approach contributes to identifying errors and enhancing clarity, ultimately presenting an error-free version of one’s work.
- Neal K. Writing style and numbers: Turning a headache into a (Jeopardy-style) game. The Writers Camp Journal, 2025; 1(2):20. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17219447
- Abstract: Numbers are crucial for clarity in academic writing, guided by APA and AMA style manuals. Generally, spell out numbers zero to nine and use numerals for 10 and above, with specific exceptions. Mastering these rules enhances editing efficiency and improves the overall presentation of your research, minimizing reviewer criticism.
Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 2025
- Nicoll LH. Welcome to Writer’s Camp. Be Part of the Adventure! The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(1):1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15345357
- Abstract: Short article welcoming people to Writer’s Camp.
- Nicoll LH. Becoming a Ruthless Editor Revisited. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(1):2. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15333137
- Abstract: Tips on how to successfully edit a paper to the proper length for a journal submission.
- Nicoll LH. Understanding the Verbs “Lay” and “Lie”: Key Differences. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(1):3. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15353187
- Abstract: A short article and table describing the differences between the verbs lay and lie. Examples are provided.
- Watson R. The Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Academic Writing. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15366886
- Abstract: AI has become a central part of everyday life, especially following OpenAI’s launch of ChatGPT on November 30, 2022. This platform allows users to easily engage with generative AI, which can answer questions and produce complex documents. It offers significant benefits, particularly for non-native English speakers, by assisting with writing and translation. However, its widespread use poses challenges in academic publishing, complicating the detection of AI-generated content and raising concerns about authorship and authenticity in scholarly work.
- Oermann M. An Essential Resource for Authors: Reporting Guidelines. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2025;1(1):5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15389180
- Abstract: Reporting guidelines are essential checklists for authors that enhance research transparency and completeness. They ensure studies are accurately reported, minimizing bias and improving reproducibility. Familiarity with guidelines is crucial for nursing authors, as these resources help in planning and documenting research effectively before manuscript submission, ultimately improving reporting quality.
- Nicoll, LH. Manuscript Success and Choosing a Topic. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(1):6. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15443066
- Abstract: Successful manuscript writing hinges on careful planning, particularly in selecting a compelling topic. Key steps include journal diligence, template analysis, and drafting. Authors should focus on engaging topics that resonate with editors. Ultimately, effective topic selection enhances the likelihood of publication, leading to a rewarding writing experience.
- Gill M. Writing and the Art of Doodling. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(1):7. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15392024
- Abstract: The article discusses the author’s experience with doodling as an effective warm-up for writing. It emphasizes that all nurses are expected to write in their careers, and doodling can help unlock creative ideas. By expressing thoughts through doodles, writers alleviate the intimidation of a blank page, facilitating clearer communication.
- Nicoll LH. Academic papers: considerations in topic selection. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1),8. https://doi.org:10.5281/zenodo.15522536
- Abstract: Selecting the right topic is essential for transforming an ultimate academic paper into a publishable journal article. Writers must avoid merely cutting and pasting their original work; instead, they should rethink their approach, ensuring the manuscript presents novel information tailored to journal standards, while addressing any research flaws honestly.
- Chinn PL. Writer’s Camp Care Package: The “Cs” of Scholarship. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(1):10. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15490935
- Abstract: In the early 1990s, a template outlining the “Cs” of good scholarship was created for PhD students, evolving from 13 to 16 key traits. These contrasting characteristics promote a comprehensive understanding of scholarship. The concepts emphasize diverse perspectives, substantial content, and the importance of originality, credibility, and ethics in scholarly work.
- Fawcett, J. The Grammar Camp Counselor: Using Which or That—That is the Question. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1),9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15475319
- Abstract: The article explores the grammatical distinction between “which” and “that,” emphasizing their roles in restrictive and non-restrictive clauses. It discusses the use of commas as indicators for these clauses, highlights differences in definitions from various sources, and offers practical writing advice for improving clarity and correctness in sentence construction.
- Nicoll LH. Manuscript Success: Journal Due Diligence. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1),17. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15570045
- Abstract: The process of Journal Due Diligence (JDD) is essential for selecting the best journal for manuscript submission. Authors should carefully evaluate journals based on fit, audience, and previous publications. By creating a shortlist of three journals and thoroughly researching them, authors can increase their chances of acceptance and streamline the submission process.
- Dunlap JJ. The Writable Moment. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 1(1):11. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15564731
- Abstract: Jayne Jennings Dunlap emphasizes the importance of seizing “writable moments” in writing, especially for busy nurses. By sharing personal examples, she illustrates how immediate inspiration can lead to impactful writing. She encourages embracing spontaneity and progress over perfection in writing, suggesting practical strategies to capture ideas promptly to enhance professional engagement.
- Nicoll LH. Manuscript Success: Journal Due Diligence Part II, Special Considerations. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1):12. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15620094
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of thorough journal evaluation for manuscript submission. She warns against predatory journals, discusses various publishing models (traditional, hybrid, open access), and clarifies that societal membership doesn’t guarantee expedited review. Additionally, she addresses misconceptions regarding journal impact factor and citation styles, suggesting they should not hinder journal selection.
- Martin SA. Writing an Op-ed for Change. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025; 1(1):13. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15594412
- Abstract: Sarah A. Martin shares her journey of becoming an op-ed writer for “On Call 4 Kids” to address firearm violence impacting children. After attending workshops and receiving mentorship, she details the process of writing, refining her piece, and navigating the submission process. Martin emphasizes the influential role nurses can play in advocating for change through writing.
- Nicoll LH. Manuscript Success: Journal Due Diligence Part III: Journal Selectors. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1):14. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15668413
- Abstract: The evaluation of journal finders by Leslie H. Nicoll highlights their limited effectiveness in helping researchers identify suitable academic journals. Despite user-friendly interfaces, results often lack relevance and accuracy. Manual journal research remains essential for ensuring fit, particularly in specialized fields like nursing, emphasizing the importance of thorough journal due diligence.
- Kelly L. Rejection, Resilience, and the Risk of Saying Yes. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1):15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15603064
- Abstract: Lisa Kelly, a nurse researcher, discusses the emotional impact of rejection in nursing scholarship. Emphasizing that rejection is part of the academic journey, she encourages resilience and self-affirmation. Kelly highlights the significance of nurturing one’s voice and confronting self-doubt, urging fellow scholars to persist and embrace their unique contributions to nursing literature.
- Chinn PL., Nicoll LH. Blog Post, Journal Article, or Both? The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2025;1(1):16. doi:10.5281/zenodo.15641379
- Abstract: Peggy L. Chinn and Leslie H. Nicoll discuss the similarities and differences between blogs and journal articles, focusing on purpose, structure, tone, and engagement. Blogs are more conversational and approachable, while journal articles maintain formal authority. Both platforms can complement scholarly work, enabling broader outreach and interaction within the nursing discipline.