The Writer’s Camp Journal: Issues 2026




Volume 2, Number 3, Autumn 2026
Volume 2, Number 3, Summer 2026
Volume 2, Number 2, Spring 2026
- Chinn PL. Nursing theory think tanks: Bridges between knowledge and action. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2(2):1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19025284
- Abstract: This month’s Trail Pack features a discussion on nursing theory, with contributions from experts Peggy Chinn, Afaf Meleis, and Jacqueline Fawcett. It includes an engaging article, video conversation, and insights into the significance of informal scholarly gatherings for fostering intellectual growth and exploring nursing theory. Participants are encouraged to reflect and form their own think tanks.
- Watson R. Academic publishing survives despite its flaws. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2026; 2(2): 2. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18285119
- Abstract: Roger Watson critiques the academic publishing model, emphasizing its resilience despite ethical concerns surrounding profit extraction from publicly funded research. He highlights issues like paywalls, predatory journals, and the impending threat of AI-generated content. While reforms are necessary, he questions their feasibility due to existing financial incentives linking universities, publishers, and academics.
- Kirton CA. Wordcraft at camp: Healthcare versus health care. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(2):3. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19442225
- Abstract: Carl A. Kirton discusses the orthographic variants “healthcare” and “health care,” emphasizing the importance of consistency in writing. Different style guides vary in their preferences for these terms, often treating them as interchangeable. Ultimately, authors should follow the style requirements of their target journal while maintaining clarity in their manuscripts.
- Chicca J. Dear Colleague: Show your article title some love with these tips. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2026; 2(2): 4. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19696693
Volume 2, Number 1, Winter 2026
- Owens JK, Nicoll LH, Carter Templeton H, Chinn PL, Oermann MH, Edie AH, De Gagne JC. Trail Pack: Evidence-based recommendations to inform currency and number of references. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):1. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17724399
- Abstract: The inaugural Trail Pack at Writer’s Camp features a unique learning experience combining a research report, a podcast, and an article discussing reference currency and quantity in scholarly writing. It emphasizes the importance of recent literature while acknowledging the relevance of historical sources, offering guidelines and decision-making algorithms for effective literature selection.
- Watson R, Hayter M. Misuse of methods in academic publishing: A growing concern. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2026; 2(1):2. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18039465
- Abstract: Editors Roger Watson and Mark Hayter highlight the troubling trend of method misuse in nursing research. Many complex studies lack theoretical foundations and meaningful contributions, driven by a “publish or perish” mentality. They urge a focus on substantive research questions and propose education reform for editors, reviewers, and academic leaders to combat this issue.
- Nicoll LH. Journals as Systems: Rethinking How Scholarly Publishing Works. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):3. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18099850
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll discusses the complexities of scholarly journal publishing, emphasizing the need to view journals as systems rather than mere labels like “predatory” or “legitimate.” This perspective fosters more meaningful conversations about journal operations and integrity, ultimately promoting a clearer understanding of their diverse functions within scholarly communication. The upcoming Journal Systems Framework will facilitate this approach.
- Nicoll, LH. How journals work: A systems-based framework for understanding scholarly publishing. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):4. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18037409
- Abstract: Scholarly journals are often judged by prestige or impact, yet these signals reveal little about how journals actually function. The Journal Systems Framework offers a systems-based way to understand differences in editorial intent, capacity, infrastructure, and governance—helping authors, editors, and institutions move beyond simplistic labels toward clearer, more informed conversations about publishing.
- Fawcett J. Writing a Column for a nursology journal: A personal experience. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):5. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18215212
- Abstract: Jacqueline Fawcett reflects on her journey with HumanBecoming Theory and her writing experience for Nursing Science Quarterly, initially influenced by Rosemarie Rizzo Parse. She emphasizes the significance of precise language in nursing discourse and shares insights on collaborating with colleagues and the meaningful engagement with nursing’s metaparadigm in her columns.
- Dunlap JJ, Waldrop JB. Writing retreats your way. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):6. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18213788
- Abstract: Jayne Jennings Dunlap and Julee Briscoe Waldrop emphasize the adaptability of writing retreats, detailing their experience with a virtual retreat due to unforeseen circumstances. They highlight the importance of dedicated time for writing, whether solo or group-based, and encourage readers to envision their own dream retreats to enhance creativity and productivity.
- Chicca J, Shellenbarger T. Don’t hate on the percolate. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):7. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18250562
- Abstract: Drs. Jenny Chicca and Teresa Shellenbarger compare writing to coffee brewing methods, emphasizing the importance of percolation. While Chicca favors quick writing, Shellenbarger believes in allowing ideas to develop over time. They discuss how percolation enhances creativity and organization, encouraging writers to take their time and refine their thoughts for better outcomes.
- Richards AJ. From one minute to five: designing a collaborative writing assessment that works. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):8. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18235834
- Abstract: The content introduces the Five-Minute Peer Writing Activity (FMPWA) developed by Andrew Richards to enhance nursing students’ engagement and learning. This collaborative assessment replaces the traditional one-minute paper, fostering effective peer feedback and improving understanding. Research shows significant increases in student satisfaction and performance, affirming its adaptability in educational settings.
- Pickler RH. We get letters. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):9. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18270341
- Abstract: Rita H. Pickler discusses the roles of queries and letters to the editor in the publication process. Queries help authors assess manuscript fit with journals, while letters engage in critical discussions about published papers. Adhering to guidelines is essential for both, ensuring meaningful contributions to scholarly dialogue.
- Waldrop JB, Reynolds SS, Dunlap JJ. When reporting methods, accurate language matters. The Writer’s Camp Journal. 2026; 2(1):10. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18355843
- Abstract: Julee Briscoe Waldrop, Staci S. Reynolds, and Jayne Jennings Dunlap discuss the importance of precise language in reporting quality improvement (QI) initiatives versus research studies in nursing. They highlight common misconceptions, provide examples, and stress that correct terminology enhances publication acceptance and improves understanding for better healthcare practice.
- Nicoll LH. How to read like a scholar (without drowning). The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):11. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18483975
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of purposeful reading for scholars to manage overwhelming reading loads. By defining clear goals, adapting reading speeds, and knowing when to stop, academics can engage with literature effectively. Nicoll advocates for maintaining pleasure reading to enhance overall comprehension and joy in the reading process.
- Normandin PA. Why nurse editors belong on Institutional Review Boards: Editorial leadership as patient advocacy. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):12 doi:10.5281/zenodo.18356806
- Abstract: Patricia A. Normandin emphasizes the critical role of nurses, particularly nurse editors, in Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). She argues that their unique clinical and editorial perspectives enhance research oversight by ensuring participant safety and clarity in protocols. By advocating for patient-centered practices, they address gaps in traditional research reviews, fostering more humane and effective studies.
- Nicoll LH. Wordcraft at Camp: False Precision. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2(1):13 doi:10.5281/zenodo.18664075
- Abstract: False precision misleads readers by presenting numbers with inconsistent or unnecessary decimal places, suggesting greater accuracy than exists. This can create confusion about data analysis and distract from the main narrative. Maintaining consistent precision, usually with whole numbers for percentages, enhances clarity and effective communication.
- Rohan AJ, Nicoll LH. Email Etiquette for Authors: Editor Irks, Super Irks, and How to Avoid Them. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):14 doi:10.5281/zenodo.18391351
- Abstract: Annie J. Rohan and Leslie H. Nicoll present essential guidelines for professional email etiquette aimed at authors communicating with editors. They emphasize that emails should be clear, respectful, and appropriately formatted, with the correct use of salutations and avoiding casual language, such as emojis and textisms. Authors should be mindful of their relationship with editors, addressing them formally unless invited otherwise, and carefully considering the content and tone of their messages. Key “editor irks” identified include using generic salutations, improper journal names, and marking emails as high importance. Overall, professional email habits reflect one’s reputation and respect for the recipient.
- Patterson BJ. Mastering the research brief: the art of brevity and clarity. The Writers Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):15. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18733291
- Abstract: Barbara J. Patterson discusses the art of crafting a research brief, which condenses extensive research into a concise format for busy clinicians and policymakers. Emphasizing clarity and brevity, she advises focusing on the core message, actionable insights, and practical implications. This approach bridges the gap between evidence and decision-making in nursing practice.
- Shellenbarger T. Revisiting writing productivity: ten years later with ten additional tips. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):16. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18773461
- Abstract: Teresa Shellenbarger shares ten updated tips for enhancing writing productivity, building on her previous advice from a decade ago. Key strategies include writing about familiar topics, maintaining an idea file, developing a clear purpose statement, starting without perfection, breaking projects into smaller tasks, and seeking mentorship.
- Nicoll LH, Oermann M, Chinn PL, Conklin JL. Author guidance as editorial infrastructure: what we knew, what has changed, and why this still matters. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2(1):17 doi:10.5281/zenodo.18776278
- Abstract: This month’s Trail Pack explores a part of scholarly publishing that is everywhere—and rarely examined: instructions for authors. Featuring two foundational 2018 studies by Marilyn Oermann and colleagues, along with a new original essay written for this Trail Pack, this collection revisits how journals communicate expectations to authors and how that guidance
- Nicoll LH. Version control is editorial kindness. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026; 2(1):18. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18838798
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the significance of effective version control in collaborative writing, highlighting its impact on trust, momentum, and overall productivity. Confusion over document versions can lead to unnecessary stress and inefficiencies. By establishing clear systems and using shared platforms, collaborators can mitigate these challenges, fostering a more caring and efficient writing process.
- Saver C. The Power of Parallelism. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2026;2(1):19. doi:10.5281/zenodo.19002988
- Abstract: Parallel structure is a writing technique that enhances clarity and cohesion. By maintaining a consistent format for words and phrases, writers improve readability and help readers absorb key messages with less effort. This tool can be applied in various writing situations, transforming lists and sentences into well-organized, impactful text.
- Nicoll LH. Wordcraft at Camp: Frolleague. The Writer’s Camp Journal, 2(1):20. 10.5281/zenodo.19192973
- Abstract: Leslie H. Nicoll reflects on her relationship with two deceased colleagues, Dr. Julia Snethen and Dr. Jacqueline Fawcett, and introduces the term “frolleague.” A frolleague is a professional peer who feels like a friend within a work context, without personal involvement outside of the workplace, helping maintain appropriate professional boundaries.
