In January 2026, the Journal Systems Framework (JSF) was introduced for a systems-based approach to scholarly journals. An update clarifies terminology across its four dimensions without altering the framework. The JSF is being cited in diverse contexts, prompting a call for authors to report their uses to track its impact and evolution.
Tag: publishing models
As an Editor, what do I need to know about models of early publication?
Jacqueline K. Owens, PhD, RN, CNE
At the Trailhead
- Why this matters: Early publication models such as Online First, Publish Ahead of Print, and Continuous Publication affect how articles are cited, corrected, and communicated to authors. Editors need to understand these differences to avoid confusion and ensure consistent messaging.
- What judgment this supports: Helps editors decide how their journal will define and communicate early publication practices, including terminology, version control, and author expectations.
- How an editor might use this: Review the journal’s current early publication model, standardize terminology (e.g., Online First), and clarify the process in author guidelines, acceptance letters, and editorial workflows.
This content is part of the Working Guide to Editorial Systems.
Access is available to subscribers.
Join us for practical guidance, real editorial decisions,
and to learn more about the systems that shape scholarly publishing.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
How Journals Work: A Systems-Based Framework for Understanding Scholarly Publishing
Scholarly journals are often judged by prestige or impact, yet these signals reveal little about how journals actually function. The Journal Systems Framework offers a systems-based way to understand differences in editorial intent, capacity, infrastructure, and governance—helping authors, editors, and institutions move beyond simplistic labels toward clearer, more informed conversations about publishing.
Journals as Systems: Rethinking How Scholarly Publishing Works
Leslie H. Nicoll discusses the complexities of scholarly journal publishing, emphasizing the need to view journals as systems rather than mere labels like “predatory” or “legitimate.” This perspective fosters more meaningful conversations about journal operations and integrity, ultimately promoting a clearer understanding of their diverse functions within scholarly communication. The upcoming Journal Systems Framework will facilitate this approach.