How should editors use the EQUATOR network when evaluating manuscripts?

The EQUATOR Network enhances research transparency by providing reporting guidelines, which editors can utilize to strengthen submission protocols and peer review processes. Implementing these guidelines requires careful editorial judgment to ensure rigorous adherence rather than mere compliance, ultimately improving the quality of published research.
Author: Roger Watson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.67130/wges.2026.008 . . .

This content is part of the Working Guide to Editorial Systems.

Access is available to subscribers.

Join us for practical guidance, real editorial decisions,

and to learn more about the systems that shape scholarly publishing.

Join Now to Continue Reading

Already a subscriber? Log in here

How Journals Work: A Systems-Based Framework for Understanding Scholarly Publishing

Scholarly journals are often judged by prestige or impact, yet these signals reveal little about how journals actually function. The Journal Systems Framework offers a systems-based way to understand differences in editorial intent, capacity, infrastructure, and governance—helping authors, editors, and institutions move beyond simplistic labels toward clearer, more informed conversations about publishing.