The article discusses predatory publishing, emphasizing that not all questionable journals are inherently predatory. It highlights the importance of evaluating journals beyond mere labels, focusing on their operational practices and transparency. The authors advocate for a nuanced understanding of publishing challenges, urging authors to ask critical questions when assessing journals to make informed decisions.
Tag: predatory publishing
Journal Due Diligence Part II: Special Considerations
Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of thorough journal evaluation for manuscript submission. She warns against predatory journals, discusses various publishing models (traditional, hybrid, open access), and clarifies that societal membership doesn't guarantee expedited review. Additionally, she addresses misconceptions regarding journal impact factor and citation styles, suggesting they should not hinder journal selection.