Cynthia Saver emphasizes that rejection is common for authors but offers strategies to minimize it. By adhering to journal guidelines, selecting suitable publications, and improving manuscript clarity, writers can enhance their chances of acceptance. When faced with rejection, it's crucial to avoid discouragement and consider peer feedback for future submissions.
Tag: journal due diligence
Journal Due Diligence Part III: Journal Finders
By Leslie H. Nicoll, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN Writer’s Camp Director An evaluation of journal finders suggests that their utility is limited. Journal due diligence (JDD), as I have described it,1,2 is a manual process. You need to do the work of looking for potential journals, visiting their websites, searching for information, writing it down, … Continue reading Journal Due Diligence Part III: Journal Finders
Journal Due Diligence Part II: Special Considerations
Leslie H. Nicoll emphasizes the importance of thorough journal evaluation for manuscript submission. She warns against predatory journals, discusses various publishing models (traditional, hybrid, open access), and clarifies that societal membership doesn't guarantee expedited review. Additionally, she addresses misconceptions regarding journal impact factor and citation styles, suggesting they should not hinder journal selection.
Manuscript Success: Journal Due Diligence
The process of Journal Due Diligence (JDD) is essential for selecting the best journal for manuscript submission. Authors should carefully evaluate journals based on fit, audience, and previous publications. By creating a shortlist of three journals and thoroughly researching them, authors can increase their chances of acceptance and streamline the submission process.