Authors often misinterpret study limitations, confusing personal shortcomings with methodological constraints. This article emphasizes the importance of clearly distinguishing between genuine limitations of the research and those stemming from the researcher’s circumstances. Accurate presentation of limitations enhances scholarly communication, promoting transparency, rigor, and integrity in research reporting.
Tag: scholarly writing
Anthropomorphism in Academic Writing
Roger D. Carpenter discusses anthropomorphism in academic writing, emphasizing its risks of obscuring author agency and clarity. He advises against attributing human actions to nonhuman entities and suggests using first-person pronouns to clarify authorship. Style guides also advocate for maintaining clear communication about who is interpreting and analyzing research.